I,
therefore, invite you to consider, as a suggestive analogy, the
action which takes place when a bit of finely filiated platinum is
introduced into a chamber containing oxygen and sulphur dioxide.
The
analogy was that of the catalyst. When the two gases previously
mentioned are mixed in the presence of a filament of platinum, they
form sulphurous acid. This combination takes place only if the
platinum is present; nevertheless the newly formed acid contains no
trace of platinum, and the platinum itself is apparently unaffected;
has remained inert, neutral, and unchanged. The mind of the poet is
the shred of platinum. It may partly or exclusively operate upon the
experience of the man himself; but, the more perfect the artist, the
more completely separate in him will be the man who suffers and the
mind which creates; the more perfectly will the mind digest and
transmute the passions which are its material.
The
text it self explains the analogy very well, there is not much one
could add. The catalysts, indeed, remain intact at the end of the
reaction; they only make it possible for the reaction to runs in a
more favorable, faster way..
There
is another quote by Eliot about poets that I like. He said about bad
poets: “In
fact, the bad poet is usually unconscious where he ought to be
conscious, and conscious where he ought to be unconscious”. I used
this sentence, conversely, to praise the last Kiko Veneno albums
Very useful.
ReplyDelete